To answer
this we must break down the question to the level of the elements. Street
photography, so we have street and photography, well it should be easy then,
it’s about photography on the streets. Wrong! Street photography is a broad
label of any photography done in the public space or more specific the urban
public space. So to further define street photography, we can say it’s the
opposite pole to landscape photography (although there is sometimes an
urban view even in landscape photography, so it’s complicated). Well I guess
one shouldn’t define a genre by what it’s not, but I hope the message is clear.
To summarize:
1. Photography in an urban environment (not up on
an unpopulated mountain peak). But! If you make a photograph in the small
village down in the valley from that same mountain peak, it could be considered
as street photography.
2. People don’t have to be the main subject of a
street photograph or even present in the frame, but for many street
photographers people ARE the main interest.
3. A street photograph is showing a public space
(or is made from a position that is on public space, hence a photograph of
your children created in your living room is not considered a street
photograph, because it is not a public space).
Some other topics I will write about this summer is:
- B&W vs colour
- Techniques
- Where and when to shoot?
- What to shoot?
- Ethics
- Gear for the job
Here are
some photos from my last sessions in Stockholm city.
No comments:
Post a Comment